How To Lighten Background Of Pdf In Foxit Phantom

At a Glance

Expert's Rating

Pros

Groovy interface
Good PDF editing and creation features

Cons

Mediocre OCR on circuitous documents
Poor Word output of complex documents

Our Verdict

For considerably less that Acrobat, Phantom PDF provides all the PDF tools almost users demand. However, it's OCR is noticeably weaker than competitors.

If Foxit Software's Phantom PDF did nothing other than open multiple documents every bit tabs, I'd probably like it. My days with stacks of separate windows are over, and unfortunately, that's the mode both Adobe Acrobat 11 and Nuance'south Power PDF handle multiple documents. But I likewise like Phantom PDF considering it'due south a highly capable PDF editor. For everyday use, it compares quite favorably with the aforementioned competition, and costs less equally well.

Phantom PDF's interface utilizes the latest in Microsoft styles with the tool ribbon and Modernistic UI (Windows 8) expect. The GUI is well-organized and easy to navigate. My simply complaint, an exceedingly modest i, is the small size of the type in the leftmost column of the file bill of fare, which looks out of place with the larger text to the right. If I'm reaching that far to find something to complain virtually, yous know things are in good shape.

Phantom PDF has all the usual form creation features (push and radio buttons, checkboxes, text fields, etc.) and has a form recognition facility to render existing static forms editable. It also handles password and certificate protection and supports DocuSign signatures. Unlike Power PDF, information technology doesn't let y'all draw a signature, only yous tin can load 1 via an existing image.

phantom pdf2 — Phantom PDF is an excellent editor, but had some trouble with creating PDFs from scans.

As an editor for general PDF tasks, Phantom PDF is splendid; annotating, inserting, deleting and altering formatting with the best of them. Nonetheless, for creating PDFs from scans with images, curved text, odd fonts, and lots of layout elements, non and so much. The search-able PDF I created from 15 circuitous documents wasn't bad, though a lot text buried in images wasn't rendered searchable, and the locations of some items were out of sync.

Just the worst was the Give-and-take document Phantom PDF created from the aforementioned input—column errors made information technology 84 pages long, rather than the 25 it should be. Phantom PDF is not in Ability PDF's, or specially Acrobat's, league in this respect. Please notation that this is a stress test designed to push the limits of OCR. Phantom PDF'due south OCR is accurate with simpler, everyday business organisation documents and forms.

Phantom PDF 6.ane is bachelor in both $89 standard and $129 business organization versions. The almost salient differences are the business concern version'southward support for PDF/A/E/X creation (the standard version merely verifies compatibility for those), epitome editing, converting text to paths (in an external editor), redaction, and some advanced Active Directory features such as Rights Management Services encryption.

For the vast majority of PDF tasks, Phantom PDF'due south ease-of-apply and broad feature set makes it a pinnacle-notch selection. It's OCR with circuitous scanned documents isn't the all-time, but that should't be a deal-breaker for most users.